<


UNDERSTANDING GOD IS A PROBLEM


 

INTRODUCTION

Human society seems to need God because there has never been a society without Him (or her or It). Even those societies that deliberately set out to be secular could not escape what we call God.
  • The United States when formed in 1789 deliberately separated religion from politics. Later, as a conqueror it did the same in the Philippines in 1902.
  • Turkey soon after its founding, in 1928, amended their new Constitution to delete the statement that, the religion of the Turkish State is Islam Making it a secular state with no religion.
  • Russia and China when declaring that Marxism was to be put into effect declared that the states were to be secular.
  • India, at the time of Independence the Constitution guaranteed freedom of conscience and religion and like the USA went as far as it could in separating the State from endorsement or support of any one religion.
In none of these countries has God disappeared. This part of the MeetingHouse for Aspiring Spirits compilation introduces the background to the belief in God. To the spiritual but not religious it is clear that belief is deeply embedded in the human brain and body. Belief in what we ought to believe-in is a very serious question. True, many humans never think about why they believe or how they believe. Most of them, however, do give some thought to what they believe. Although, they are often careless about the consequences of what they believe in,its effects on their selves and others are not denied. They just do it. What is God, At the dawn of history, thinking men and women thought it was the Wind. The Wind could not be seen, nor, did we know where it came from. The wind was mighty, cold, hot and warm, it could caress you like a lover, it brought rain, and it could be terrible in a driving storm or hurricane and so forth. Others, experiencing the Sun in all its glory, with its effects on nature and life were sure they should worship the Sun and its rays.

Why did Man use his/her imagination to find something like God to take the place of these obvious targets of awe and respect, We hope it is obvious that we will not answer that question. Still, The MeetingHouse hopes that the discussion helps you to examine, or reexamine, your own belief(s) about God. We never see fear or beauty. Nevertheless, we sense (hear, see, etc.) those things that carry within themselves signals that evoke emotions. We do not see God but we do see properties of the Earth, Universe, and our immediate environs, which produce appropriate emotions. If we did not, soon we would be dead. Some of these emotions are responses of awe, wonder, worship, thankfulness, and fear. On occasion there is a powerfully affective emotional response that is both attractive and awe-inspiring. It is a feeling that we are in the presence of something greater than ourselves. It gives many of us meaning and purpose. For most of us it is the natural sense of God. Some confuse It with Love and others feel that if they had enough Money they could and would buy it. Before we go on, please consider this paraphrase from an early Celtic Christian's words of praise to God:

I am the wind which
Breathes upon the sea,
I am the wave of the ocean,
I am the murmur of the billows. . .
I am the beam of the sun,
I am a trout in the rapid water,
I am a marshy lake in the plain,
I am words of knowledge , . . .
I am God, who created the
Fire in Your Head. (Anon.)

We hope the MeetingHouse has prepared the Way. As you read about God, Love, and Money we hope your mind compares how human imagination has perceived these quite different creations, objects, or beliefs.





GOD, LOVE, & MONEY

Does Love have a future, Does Money have a future, No one doubts that they do, But, for some reason many doubt that God has a future. As we enter the 21st century of the Common Era (CE) we will consider the idea of GOD. God is a very serious subject. To lead into its discussion, first, lets us consider Love and Money. The world as we knew it is fading into the past. As a preliminary to consider God,consider the meaning and nature of Love.

To read more on the meaning of love and money, click here

What is Love, What is the Future of Love,

We are now beginning to perceive the extraordinary range and power of the human imagination. Is love a product of the human imagination, What is love, It is a question as well as a feeling. Age and geography are irrelevant. Those who have been in love know its awe-inspiring power. Love seems to be similar to the obsessive-compulsive disorder. We were happiest when we knew it as the powerful emotion that inspired song and verse. Now we are told that it has to do with serotonin levels. When tested, levels of serotonin were 40 percent lower in both passionate lovers and those with the obsessive disorder. They have a similar chemical profile. What is Love, Still we do fall in love. Sometimes over and over subjecting ourselves to a sick state of mind. Have you heard, giddy with love, Forlorn with love, Psychiatrists have concocted too many theories about why we fall in love and with whom we do. Love is reactive not proactive. He or she just feels right. Anthropologists used to think that romance was a Western idea. A product of chivalry and the like. It was assumed that non-Westerners with their broad social and family obligations did not respond to particular passions. (Since we do not want to weigh down our discussion about God with a prolonged discussion of this other powerful human emotion, love, we will truncate the discussion here.

To learn more about emotion and love, Click Here


In
some major cultures such as India and China many see romantic love as dangerously disruptive. In India, it is a threat to a caste system crafted over centuries. These cultures, including much of China, arrange marriages as a means of preserving lineage, gene pools, and social status. Sad to say, from recent events, there are gruesome tales of parents hanging a boy and girl who dared to follow their dopamine (should I say hearts,). Another couple who eloped was stripped and beaten. Still, another couple committed suicide when their parents forbade them to marry. Obviously, the emotion labeled love is not merely a figment of the imagination. Some sublimate love (or divert it) into a pursuit of money and its accumulation ,wealth.

For some the love of God is the highest objective. Humans can be intense about their love for art objects, music, and mathematics, need I go on, Does human imagination know no bounds, The power of these objects over humans' minds would border on the amazing if it were not so common place. Before we turn to the more serious discussion about , The Problem of God,we consider the power of fiat (paper) Money. Most of us must trust available paper money as the legal tender for human transactions. Money is used for transferring goods and services. Our trust in these pieces of paper (or electronic blips representing the same) is required by law , we must trust.) I say must because the sovereign nations compel our trust. Some hoard valuables such as gold because they don't trust forced trust. We use our human imaginations to trust the current money that circulates in good Earth's economic system.

What is Money, Why do we Love it, Where is its Power,

Money has a history almost as long as the history of both God and Love. The first successful substitute for things of real value that could be bartered or exchanged was probably the cowries shells exchanged over a wide area of Asia, Africa, the Middle East and parts of Europe. The shell was easily transported, it was small, glossy, brightly colored, and durable, and it had no other utility, and was relatively scarce and not easily imitated. It was one of the first pieces of money to gain wide currency. It enabled humans to rise above mere barter and the exchange of like-things in face-to-face negotiations.

Money is without a doubt one of humans' best and greatest inventions. It enables people to deal at great distances without meeting the other party. It provides a common unit of value so a horse could be exchanged for some land, or, worse for a man to buy a woman who had been enslaved by her family. (A tragic note: There are more slaves on the planet Earth today than at anytime in the history of humans.) Money was a magical transformer that even increased trust which is a scare commodity among strangers. Overtime, the cowrie shells were replaced by precious gold and silver because was better. They had very little utility except as adornment. Yet, unlike shells metals could be melted down and reshaped. Best of all money as a store of value could be security for a loan to one who needed money more than the owner did. The owner became a lender of something artificial and the creditor of a debtor until repaid.


Through the use of a piece of paper (representing the debt) the debtor promised his full faith and credit to repay the loan. The lender trusted him. (Seldom her , women were generally barred from commerce.) Another miracle of the human imagination had occurred by means of money. Magically, genuine money , gold coins and silver , could be used to expand the supply of money by at least a multiplier of one. The community multiplier was born! Money begat money. Amazing as it may seem the community multiplier was extremely powerful. Often the piece of paper (a bank note) changed hands , buying good and services , many times before it became due. The circulation of paper claims on vault stored real money multiplied wealth for the community many times over. The history of money is filled with stories of human ingenuity as giant intellects found yet another way to extend its magic.


Today, we trust our banking system to have our so-called money in our account so we can draw upon it. Obviously, there is no gold or silver there. In fact, there isn't even a stack of paper currency. All that awaits our contractual power to draw upon it are the electronic blips on magnetic media. No more money, Does that mean there is no there , There, Well it has become more complicated than that. If God had any interest in the subject I feel he might forbid the following expose'. Because, as you will see, the emperor has no clothes. Still, this is not necessarily a fraud on the public. In any case, it is an exercise in trust and hope. We will now make an apparently bald assertion. The value and price of gold, silver and other precious substances can not be trusted any more than paper money. This is especially true as population pressures on the use of commodities soars.


We sorely need to expand credit to facilitate the growth of capital for our very needy billions of humans. Gold and silver can not do it unless paper money is used to expand credit. It is obvious that we can not trust . Gold (and its equivalents) to provide sufficient capital for the Earth's fast growing population. Though the history and the fate of paper money is of interest to many, because our main interest, here, is to consider the "Problem of God" we will set aside our discussion of money. Still we go on trusting fiat money.

To Read More about Money, Click Here

Why trust paper money, Governments obviously can be mismanaged. They can manipulate the supply of their paper money by using their printing presses to pay their bills. They can and do default on their obligations. This can result in severe austerity for the local public because other nations no longer will accept the full faith and credit of the defaulting nation. This seems better than turning one's fate over to the gold traders because in a democracy the ordinary public has the power of the vote to put bad managers out of power. If they vote. The entire foregoing enables one to see that today fiat money is less subject to market vagaries and human manipulations than gold and silver so long as the governments can be trusted to do the right thing.

The central banks of the nations of our global economy are all forced by the floating value of their currency against the value of the other currencies to maintain sufficient reserves to settle their accounts. In this way a vast network of national treasuries is standing behind the illusion that paper money is worth more than the paper it is printed upon so long as other nations will play the same game according to agreed rules. Why do we believe in the illusion that paper money is valuable and can be trusted, There are many reasons all of which are rationales for the illusion. Obviously, buying good, productive land makes more sense. (What does productive mean?) But it would ill behoove the world to turn away from fiat (paper) money.

The big reason is the growing pressure of increasing population demand on the supply of real goods such as land, commodities, food stuffs, transportation etc. We can expect a billion more mouths to feed in less than twelve years because of uncontrolled human baby production and lowering death rates. This huge increase in demand has obvious needs. Money, marvelous money provides the easy expansion of credit to facilitate the movement of goods anywhere in the world where they are needed so long as the needy party has money. So long as the creditors who have a surplus of money are willing to expand credit by issuing money to those in need the illusion of valuable money solves the problem by increasing the quantity of money in circulation. Can this go on forever, Yes, so long as the ordinary public is hard working and their own productivity increases the quantity of real goods to pay for the paper money. Isn't money a miracle,

Many readers of the foregoing having never examined the nature of money are probably confused and perplexed by what has been said. How can money be nothing, but still be something we trust for buying and selling valuable things, It is profoundly simple. We have put our faith and trust in the abstract idea that all will be done right in the end. Doesn't it sounds like we should pray and hope. Right, In God we Trust is printed on the money. With paper money around believing in God seems to be an act of wisdom. But can humans be trusted, Does it seem to you that money has many attributes and characteristics that are similar to those we attribute to God, Never gave it a thought,


WHY DO WE THINK ABOUT GOD,
HOW DO WE THINK ABOUT GOD


How do we think about God, Those who are spiritual but not religious have given it serious thought. Darwin's God was kind, loving, and just. When his beloved young daughter, Anne, died, his choice was to stop believing in God Both Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler the architects of the theory that underlies our understanding of the motions of the stars and gravity saw God as a divine mathematician. On the other hand, Einstein accepted virtually none of the traditional images of God, seeing God exclusively in the explicably rational and ultimately inspiring foundation of the universe. Many, but not all, physicists are greatly moved by the beautiful underlying rationality of the universe. Others, say God can not be known by the powers of human knowledge. What do we say about a God who seems to inspire suicide bombers, What we can know with the greatest of clarity is: how little we can know in the rational sense about God. God is not knowable.

Einstein on Science and Religion

Below is an extended excerpt from an article about science and religion by Albert Einstein. It should set us on a useful quest for God:

Religion and science are clearly marked off from each other. Nevertheless, there exists a strong reciprocal relationship. In the past, religion determined the goals of science while religion has learned from science. Good science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with aspirations toward truth and better understanding. I (Einstein) can not conceive of a scientist who does not have faith in the possibility that the rules of existence are rational and can be known. Science without religion is lame,religion without science is blind. I must qualify what I have said with reference to the actual content of historical religions. In the youthful period of mankind's spiritual evolution, Man sought to alter the apparent will of God by means of prayer and magic.

At present the idea of God in religions is a sublimation of that old concept. Its anthropomorphic character is shown by the fact men appeal to the Divine Being in prayers and plead for the fulfillment of their wishes. The idea of an omnipotent, just, beneficent and personal God accords man with solace, help and guidance. In addition, by virtue of its simplicity God is accessible to undeveloped and unexamined minds. This being omnipotent of course includes human actions. But, how is it possible to hold men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an Almighty Being, for if he is omnipotent then he must pass judgment on Himself. In view of questionable actions how can we ascribe only goodness and righteousness to Him, This personal anthropomorphic God is the main source of the present day conflict between religion and science. Science is mainly a programmatic idea. Science seeks to establish general rules which determine the reciprocal connection between objects and events in time and space, or laws of nature , absolute general validity is required, not simply proven.

The principles are founded on partial successes. However, this is not human deception. On the basis of these generalities, we are able to predict the temporal behavior of phenomena in certain domains with great precision and certainty. This ability is deeply embedded in the consciousness of modern man,even though he has grasped very little of the contents of these laws.

Clearly, some phenomena are too complex for scientific methods. One need only think of the weather. We know that occurrences in weather are beyond exact prediction because of the variety of factors not because of a lack of order in nature. Also, we have only recently begun to penetrate the regularities obtaining within living things. What is still lacking is a grasp of connections that enable profound generalizations. Though the doctrine of a personal God interfering with natural events will never be refuted by science this is because the believer in such an idea can always take refuge in those domains within which scientific knowledge has not set foot. Are the unexplained domains inexplicable as some humans believe, Science is putting that question to the test in the long run. A widely respected modern guru, once said,

The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based a religious sense arising from the experiences of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description... If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.
(Albert Einstein.)

Albert Einstein's universe was a miraculous place to ordinary humans. Atoms congregated in discernible numbers, moved in detectable directions, danced on the heads of pins so to speak. Light traveled as a wave, and as a flow of particles. The intricacies of the Earth and the cosmos could be captured in a single elegant equation: E=MC2. He said, I want to know how God created this world,I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts,the rest are details. Another great physicist, Steven Weinberg, said, . . . .Even when physicists will have gone as far as they can go, when we have a final theory, we will not have a completely satisfying picture of the world, because we will still be left with the question: why, (One is reminded of Archibald MacLeish's words in the mouth of God when Job asked, Why, God's reply was, Who are you to ask? Why not, see JB, the play.)

The Cosmological Constant

Weinberg said that some seem to find fine-tuned values that allow for the possibility of life in a way that could be explained by the intervention of a designer with some special interest in life. Weinberg, among others, is not impressed with the supposed evidence. However, he does find that there is one constant whose value does seem remarkably well adjusted in our favor. It is the energy density of empty space, also known as the cosmological constant. Astronomical observations show that the cosmological constant is quite small. Very much smaller than might have been guessed by first principles. Still we seem to be in a much bigger universe in which big bangs go off all the time, each one with different values for the fundamental constant.

Some of these values could very well be constants that take values favorable to life even though many fewer wherein life is possible. Weinberg goes on to say that you don't have to invoke a benevolent designer to explain why we are one of the parts of the universe where life is possible: in all the other parts of the universe there is no one to raise the question. It is possible that there is some tiny fraction of planets somewhere on which there are living beings that are capable of thinking about the universe, as we are doing, here. But should we borrow money against the future to find out about that when we have so many large problems to solve in the here and now such as world-wide poverty, Plus poverty of the spirit among many world leaders. There are few signs of external benevolence that might show the hand of a benevolent designer. The sun which warms us is not a constant because it is dying. So what do we do, Turn to God for counsel,

Religion Has Done Big Bad Harm in the Name of God

Tragically, there are endless examples of big harm done by small minded men in the name of one religion or another. In the twentieth century it was a Muslim who killed Sadat, a Jewish zealot who killed Rabin, and a Hindu zealot who killed Gandhi. No one would say that Hitler was a Christian zealot. Yet, it is hard to imagine Nazism taking the form it did without the passing of centuries during which Christians' educated there young in the methods of anti-Semitism. Such careful industrious planning for the final solution had to have a training ground. For another hideous example, it was pious Christian English and Dutch who plied the slave trade that caused other devoted Christians to demand an end to the preaching from the pulpit that was justifying slavery. Before Man found the moral strength to end this earlier stage of the horrific injustice, arguments for slavery quoted scripture in the Parliament and US Congress. Pitt was among those who led the battle for abolition yet, he was not known for his piety. With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil,but for good people to do evil it seems that they take the robes of religion to cover their sins.

So what do we do, Certainly, man is not God nor is he a God. But, then man is not merely an animal. We seem to be something-in-between afflicted with hubris.The disease of humans who would be God. Obviously, humans need more humility, especially after we have created such terrible weapons that we have enabled the warriors of science to solemnly say that they could use these inventions to wipe out human life on this planet, or worse to end the planet itself. We forward our tax dollars to them so they can do this horrible work. Looking at the historical record, most of the humans who occupy this planet, with other animals and plants, seem to have little if any respect for the Earth. In our time, we are facing the possibility of a catastrophic eco-spasm.

Within two or three generations excessive baby production and unthinking application of health measures to decrease infant mortality (God's way to maintain the balance,) will threaten our good Earth's carrying capacity with a human population too large in numbers for the planet to support. In the face of thousands dying of famine and drought, religious leaders continue to urge humans to procreate without reasonable restraint. It is time for us to consider Plan B3.0 offered by the Earth Policy Institute. We must rescue the planet from ourselves. The planet Earth is under extreme stress and our civilizations are in trouble. Though technology holds out some promises, more and more humans doubt the ability of humans to resolve obstinate social and political problems that stand in the way of resolving our differences. Can we cooperate to solve the dire threats, Religious ought to be providing the ideas that would make working together possible for humans.

Maybe the Idea of God no Longer Works For Enough of Us,

Secularists of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries saw agnosticism as a product of reasonable analysis of the present facts. Atheists are convinced, by application of reason, to accept the idea that the absence of God is a necessary first step toward confronting the problems of Man. Like the crowd of amused people surrounding Nietzsche's madman when he cried out in agony over the apparent death of God, many are unmoved by the prospect of life without God. Should people defiantly reject God to conserve their energies in order to pour out all their love upon mankind, Certainly, God has been used by those claiming leadership to stunt human creativity so humans would focus on unproductive praying in the face of obvious need for healthy change. We have said that science tells us there may be intelligent life on some far planets. This is not meaningless because we can see how humans could verify or deny it once the necessary technology is available.

Similarly, a simple believer in the traditional Old Man in the Sky is not making a meaningless statement. This is because after a human's death he/she ought to be able to find out whether or not this is true. Yet, to speak of scientific verification of a belief (as in religion) or unbelief (as in atheism) is logically impossible. There is nothing in the concept of God to deny or be skeptical about. Like poetry or music, religion is not amenable to this kind of discourse or verification without hidden assumptions by either side of the argument. As the MeetingHouse has demonstrated in providing readers with a review of many religions, not all religious people have looked to God to provide them with an explanation for the Universe and/or a meaning for life. Science has been threatening only to fundamentalists such as Western Christians.

To scientists and philosophers who find no room for God in their rational system such as Jews, Orthodox Christians, Muslims, Taoists, and mystics of the middle Ages,God is an idea that can not be proven. Nor can heaven be located within a physical universe anymore than the Buddhist nirvana. More and more people are saying the old mythology is invalid. Simple faith in the Old Man in the Sky is clearly impossible without naive, blind, acceptance of works of human imagination.

Why Not Believe in the Beau Ideal of- The Meaningful Existence of Those Who Walked With God,

Sophisticated theologians, like Thomas Jefferson, are saying we must do without God and hold on to Jesus of Nazareth, Gautama the Buddha, Mahatma Gandhi, Lao Tzu, Mohammed, the words of the Jewish Prophets and Rabbis, and leading holy women such Teresa of Avila, Hildegard of Tubingen, and others. Why can't we see the Gospel as, The good news of Jesus, a free man, who set other men free, Jesus of Nazareth was the liberator who defined what it meant to be a man. Like Luther, humans must leave the cloister and go out into the neighborhood to serve secular man in the world of technology, power, sex, money, and the city. Living the life of Jesus everyday was to be the solution for those who could not find God. Still, how many humans are capable of living by such a golden but demanding standard,

Turning to the Incomprehensible God -the Supreme Being

Is it better to return to an overarching idea of a God who is greater than human beings - a God who may be incomprehensible, At least people would have an option of believing in this inscrutable God and choosing to affirm a meaning for life as lived even in the midst of an indefinable meaninglessness. Believing in a reasonable explanation for the tragedies of life many is better than a fanciful myth. With the power of modern knowledge humans can not have faith in a weak and indifferent God. But, instead they can draw strength from a living presence in their minds of God , a God who made people strong enough to pray and envision hope at Auschwitz. We have the awful present knowledge that if this God is omnipotent he could have prevented the Christian Germans from the horrifying sins of the Holocaust at Auschwitz, Buchenwald and other hell holes such as Rwanda and the slaughter of the Christians in China during the 20th century. Worse, if he could have prevented these sins of Man and chose not to, he is blameworthy and not trustworthy.

Jews are not the only people who suffered and died because of the Holocaust, nor are they the only people who feel that the Holocaust put an end to conventional religions. Nevertheless, the spiritual but not religious, in the face of it all, find that believing in God is better than the negation of being.

It is also true that even in Auschwitz some Jews continued to study the Talmud and observe the traditional festivals, not because they hoped that God would rescue them but because it made sense. There is a story that one day in Auschwitz, a group of Jews put God on trial before the Rabbi. They charged him with cruelty and betrayal. Like Job, they found no consolation in the usual answers to the problem of evil and suffering in the midst of their insufferable loathsome experience. After the trial presentations they could find no excuse for God, no extenuating circumstances, so they found him guilty and presumably worthy of death. The Rabbi pronounced that as theverdict. Then he looked up and said that the trial was over: It was time for the evening prayer.

The MeetingHouse's Spiritual but Not Religious Know Our Modern Image of God has Changed

The spiritual but not religious are convinced that the personal God of traditional Western religions will go. But they also believe that God is necessary for the well being of: body, mind, soul, and spirit of most humans. This is because of the nature of reality in the real world. For humankind, a deep-rooted anxiety is part of the human condition. It is not a neurosis because it is ineradicable Therapy and chemicals can not permanently take it away. We fear loss of much that we have,and death is threatening, always, as we watch our bodies gradually but inexorably decay. A god who interferes with natural events, or is an independent cause of natural events makes God an object. Maybe he or she would be the highest being, but, nevertheless a personified object. Too obviously, the Old Man in the Sky is a creation of imaginative minds.

If God is seen as a Self in a world of his own,an ego that is related to a thou,a cause separate from him,then He (or should we say She) becomes a Being among other beings. Surely, humans are ready to see that an omnipotent, all knowing tyrant is not much different from earthly dictators who make everything and everybody cogs in their machine. Instead, we should seek to find a God beond this personal God. All humans have to use symbols (words) when they talk about being. Many Chinese do not use the word God they use the word Tao. For centuries, humans in the West in order to bear the terror of life and the horror of death, we have symbolically expressed it as God.

For humans the experience of faith in this God or that God is not a unique state from other emotional or intellectual experiences. Since God is Being which precedes and is the fundament to all our emotions such as courage, hope and despair, it is not a distinct separable state from each one of our normal human experiences. God is inseparable from human psychology. What has happened is that as human knowledge such as science has accrued it has propelled us away from magic, superstition and ignorance. Modern men and women see an unfolding universe evolving from our understanding of things, to personalities, to spirit and finally to a pervasive God-spirit,the climax is. God is within us, God is everywhere, and living is a sacrament of His /Her presence. The scriptures of major religions tell us that God is love and Compassion. Science shows that the natural world progresses toward both ever greater complexity and greater unity. For example, should Christians focus on Jesus, the Man, rather than the cosmic portrait of Christ in Paul’s epistles?

Today, they could see Christ as an example of the climax of the evolutionary process when God becomes all in all. By the grace of God there is no reason why Taoists, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, and others could not follow similar paths to such enlightenment. Obviously, no religion could have an exclusive franchise on knowing God. The history of science of man shows that the unaided intellect can not reach the vision it seeks. Humans have in the past and are now continually coming up against barriers to understanding. As always we change or attitudes. In all cultures, human beings have been driven by the same imperatives: to be intelligent, responsible, reasonable, loving, and, if necessary - change. Instead of seeking God through logic and abstractions, we look to drama, art, music, dance, poetry, fictional literature and so forth to help our senses feel and see God.

Muslims and Jews have also attempted to look back to the past to find ideas of God that will suit the modern state of mind. In the Koran one finds a way of feeling God that is not so transcendent as to become a nullity, and not so personal as to become an idol. The Koranic discourse balances the metaphorical, figurative and anthropomorphic descriptions with constant reminders that God is incomparable and not seeable. Since God is the only reality, nothing exists but him, and the world itself is properly divine.
Taoism from China encourages one to accept and live with an unseeable incomprehensible God , the Tao. Still, world peace demands that we should be more tolerant and respectful of those who do reject the word 'God' because so many appalling things have been done in His name to this day. God is Such an Important Ideal to Humans That Believing in Him May Be Superfluous God is such an important ideal that whether he exists or not, or, whether we believe in him is superfluous.

Without the idea of God there is no absolute meaning, no truth, and no morality. Worse, ethics becomes simply a matter of taste, a mood or whim. Unless, politics and morality somehow includes the idea of God those concepts will often be the domain of the shrewd, the clever, and the cynical. If there is no absolute there is no reason why we should not hate, or, that war is worse than peace. One of our earliest dreams is a longing for a just world , who has not heard a child say: That's Not Fair! Our spirits call out for justice in the face of suffering and wrongs. The fact that the spiritual but not religious keep returning to these central themes from the history of God that speak to the reality of God is not so alien to us today as many assume.

Doctrines such as the Trinity and the mythology and symbolism of other mystical systems all strove to suggest that God was beyond personality while holding on to a God incarnate. In modern times, this blurring of imagery has clouded the minds of the faithful. Today, there is a growing uneasiness with such inadequate images of the Absolute. This healthy iconoclasm is because the iconic ways of looking at God often have been abused by self-promoting religious leaders with disastrous effects on unity among God loving people.

The Backlash to Modernism , Fanatical Fundamentalism

One of the characteristic new developments since the middle twentieth century has been the rise of militant forms of religiosity that we usually call,fundamentalism. This world view is present in most of the major religions of the world including the three religions of the Book or the Word of God. A great Christian theologian recently observed, The most fanatical, the cruelest, political struggles are those that have been colored, inspired, or legitimized by religion. The spiritual but not religious take seriously the fact that religions share the responsibility for bringing peace to our to torn and warring world.

In the USA our Constitution protects religious minorities to feel free to practice their way of loving and serving God, or not, openly with a free conscience. But the whole world is afflicted by zealous sycophants of power hungry leaders who delude their followers by urging them to hate those who disagree with their own version of religion. In the USA, an aggressive form of fundamentalism known as evangelical Christians is a highly political form of spirituality that is literal and intolerant in its interpretations of the Bible. Whether it was the early Pilgrims, the Millenarians who assembled in Kentucky for a false End Time during the 1840s, or, the present day Christian fundamentalists, they have always been prone to extremist and apocalyptic enthusiasm for their self-righteous world views.

The fundamentalists campaign for the abolition of legal abortion, for censorship, for control of schools' curriculum, along with an all encompassing hard line on moral and social decency. They excuse the parental child abusers in their midst because the abusers assert they have been born again. Their leaders have openly condoned murders who have gunned down physicians or bombed abortion clinics. They say that belief in miracles is an essential hallmark of true faith. Faith in Jesus as God is a sine a qua non for acceptance,while service to God by helping others is devalued by many of them as irrelevant. They seem to have little regard for the teachings of Jesus about loving compassion for one's neighbors. They are swift to condemn the people they see as the enemies of God. Most of these so-called Christians consider Jews, Muslims, and Unitarians as destined for hellfire.

Some of their leaders have fervently argued that all oriental religions are inspired by the devil. They have encouraged the view that actions to protect the environmental biosphere are a waste of time and money, because the End Time is here, again. During the Reagan and Bush years these zealots, sure of their exclusive franchise on the golden arches to the gates of heaven, have aggressively pushed their agenda on other citizens. They believe God will give the righteous believer anything that he or she asks for in prayer. This includes success in business, selected material goods, and more food. Obesity is a form of happiness that has been promoted in the past. (For a fuller discussion of various Christian sects see the hyperlink at the HomePage , Christianity).

Unfortunately, There have been similar fundamentalists developments in the Muslim dominated nations of the world. Muslim fundamentalists have toppled government leaders, assassinated opposition leaders, and declared,their intent to kill those who point out the personality flaws of their self-appointed leaders. In our modern day, so-called Jihads, have been carrying on a dishonest corruption of the idea of the Jihad- or the personal struggle - for devote Muslims which is set forth in the Koran, These criminal leaders abuse their own religion in the name of their own war for personal power in a restructured
Islamic state. We look for Islamic sects who are opposed to using violent means to gain more followers.

There are some. Similarly, Jewish fundamentalists have used extreme forms of violence to drive away Palestinian inhabitants and to seize land elsewhere. They believe they are paving the way for the advent of the Messiah, again. In the words of Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York in 1990: There are not several messages in Judaism. There is only one. And this message is to do what God wants. Sometimes God wants us to go to war, sometimes he wants us to live in peace, but there is only one message: God wanted us to come to this country (USA) to create a Jewish state. The exclusionary attitudes expressed by these various kinds of fundamentalists are actually a retreat from God. It is not surprising that many who are spiritual but not religious have decided to relinquish their belief in God on hearing the profane words of these hate-mongers and power seekers who want to deny other people's human rights Our modern understanding of humans enable us to see that these historical phenomena that are labeled Christian Family Values, or,
Islamic States,or obtaining the promised Holy Land are the focus of a sort of religious devotion that is a modern form of idolatry. It is being encouraged by false leaders who seek personal power at the expense of world peace. This type of belligerent righteousness has been a constant temptation through the long history of God. Surely, it is not authentic.

The biblical God of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims got off to a warlike start. The tribal deity Yahweh was murderously partial to his warrior invaders when they conquered the Promised Land, Canaan. History has seen the early success of the Mohammedan horsemen who spread the Word of Allah with an offer that could not be refused , death by the sword or conversion to the faith of the Prophet. The insanity of the Christian Crusades in the name of Jesus the Lord God all elevated the war-like values of the tribe to high status. Their human leaders substituted man-made ideals for God's transcendent reality which challenges all prejudices. More important, by their bad leadership they are a denying the crucial monotheistic theme , compassion and love. In spite of the blood lust of human males, there was a change begun by the prophets. Since that time, the old pagans, Warriors for Yahweh, have been led to the ideal of love and compassion.

The compassion for others was an ideal of the ideologies that arose when the world religions broke away from tribal-centric local gods during what is called the Axial Age. Even Buddhists made a major change in their religious orientation when they introduced devotion (bhakti) to the bodhisattvas who followed Buddha. The prophets had insisted that cultic worship was useless unless society adopted a more just and compassionate ethos. Jesus and the Rabbis suggested major changes in Judaism for that same reason. Paul made certain that his new Christianity implemented it. Mohammed's expression of God's will through the Koran made the creation of a compassionate and just society the essence of the reformed religion of al-Lah. Humans find compassion is a difficult demanding virtue. To live compassionately, humans must go beyond limiting egotism and insecurity and prejudice. It is not surprising that all of the religions of the Book have failed to achieve these high standards.
In 2008, power crazed immans leaders of JIHADIC Islamists are fanning the winds of hate and war following their tragic terror at the World Trade Center. Leading Christians and Jews, of the other religions of the Book are feeding the fires of counter-attack. The good Earth is threatened with a blood bath. The MeetingHouse urges that all religions should seek counsel from The Wisdom of Balsekar -The Essence of Enlightenment (see References at Endnote this chapter.)

Ramesh Baalsekar, born a Hindu, follower of the Hindu sage, Ramana Maharishi, considered by many the world's greatest living sage has made a study of the spiritual life. He teaches a Hindu philosophy, Advaita Vedanta, which concerns non-duality in that everything is one. That we are all intrinsic parts of the universe, not separate from it. (Please see Balsekar's Poem of Creation found at the introduction to Hinduism.)

If the world is to be saved from the war of terror of the religions of the Book we all need to learn more about the spiritual life. Though human history tells us that when faced with a choice between peace and war, humans choose war, there is still time for a better choice. The Deism of the American Constitution by the Founding Fathers It was an original change to the better when many of the USA's founding fathers personally chose Deism. They did it because Western Christianity had become so conspicuously, cruel, intolerant and hypocritical. Jews, Christians, and Muslims who punctiliously attend worship yet denigrate people who belong to different ethnic and ideological camps are denying one of the basic truths of God - a loving and compassionate religion. Surely, the proverbial cock must crow three times every morning, as it did for Peter, in the face of this continuing hypocrisy. By the teachings of their own scriptures it is wrong for people who call themselves Jews, Christians, and Muslims to condone inequitable social and political systems that they control. The God of historical monotheism demands mercy, not sacrifice, compassion rather than decorous liturgy.

At an earlier time, there was what is called the Axial Age.

It is the term historians use to describe a phenomenal period from 800 , 200BCE, during which many of the most influential religious leaders in history were contemporaries. Isaiah, Socrates, and Zoroaster all gave a distinctive shape to peculiarly Western ideas. In the same brief period, Buddha, Lao-tzu, and Confucius emerged in the East. The legacies of these six men were philosophies or schools of religious thought still claim vast numbers of adherents today. All six shared certain striking similarities: each developed or refined an abstract system of thought that challenged the brains of all who attempted to understand them. All of them were based on literacy. None of these men had a relationship with a woman or men that each valued above solitude. One plausible explanation for the Axial Age is that complex abstract systems of thought came into existence because literacy, the ultimate abstraction, was the impetus that propelled these literate spiritual leaders. But, there is an appropriate question troubling feminist historians which is:

Why did misogyny so often accompany their message, (This important question will be taken up in the Homepage hyperlink God Is Also A Woman.) The misogyny of these leaders is atypical, the vast majority of men love women and have families. Most men are not the ones who withdraw from conventional life to preach doctrines that others who follow, similarly disposed, then commit to writing. These six highly influential religious leaders promulgated a new way to relate to the world. Each of them proposed a new method, path, logic, a Way, system, or Law to achieve spiritual awareness to relate to God. Only something as powerful as literacy could have stirred up the human condition to bring to the surface six such unique personalities. Why this was the same age when the Goddess began to lose her hold on the people's imagination, These men muddied the waters, as far as women were concerned. It would take twenty five hundred years before some women, and a few men, would begin to see through the muddle again. We are living that time of change.

God's Central Theme, Love and Compassion for Your Fellow Humans Now

In Taoism,Buddhism, and Hinduism there is concern for the here and now and how we conduct ourselves in this life. Concern for the here-and-now was especially marked in Islam. Muhammad who was both a political and spiritual genius was a realistic human. Generations of Muslims have shared his concern to incarnate the divine will in human history by establishing a just and decent society. The Holy God of Israel demanded a similar holiness and separation from old ways on the part of His people. Jesus' teachings were relentless in insisting on compassion and caring for the poor. The ideal for all these world religions is personal responsibility. Yet, observance of the Torah, Shariah, and Christian principles of faith has often been seen by the devout as sufficient compliance with God's objectives. However, nothing could have been further from the intentions of the men who originated and compiled these codes.

Atheists who preach emancipation from a God who demands servile obedience are protesting against a God who is sort of a Big Brother in the Sky. Obviously, for Western religion to avoid death from the rays of modern knowledge. God mist be updated from the divine Tyrant imposing his law on reluctant human servants. This ancient error must be corrected. The anthropomorphic idea of God as Lawgiver and Ruler is a poor fit for the humans borne to the post-modern era. The descriptions of the experience of God must be kept abreast of a world view seen by humans aware of DNA/RNA, the uncertainty principle of Quantum Physics, and the multi-dimensional world of the holographic universe.

To push God to inhabit the intellectual (or magical) isolation of the holy ground of heaven is now known to be unnatural and unhealthy. In our scientific age we can not think about God in the same way as our forebears. Still, the challenge of science can help us to appreciate some of the old truths. Albert Einstein, for one, had an appreciation of mystical religion. Originally, cosmology was not a scientific description of the origins of the universe but was a symbolic expression of a spiritual and psychological truth.
Taoism has been more effective in making such a view of creation as a part of human life. The old metaphysical notion of God as a personified Supreme Being is unsatisfactory except for the naïve and lazy of mind in the face of modern knowledge and thought.

We hasten to add that kind and compassionate hearts who believe in the spiritual life should never, never,destroy the faith of non-violent traditional believers.They will be led to the next step when they are ready.As we should be tolerant and patient,we ask them to be patient and respectful concerning our enthusiasm.

The Modern Mystics' Definition of God

The God of the mystics seems to present a possible alternative. Mystics have long insisted God is not an , Other Being- that the He does not exist and it is better to call the idea a Nothing. Albeit, a sophisticated form of nothing. The mystics approach God through the imagination as a kind of art form, an expression of ineffable beauty. The mystery, the value of life is expressed by the mystics using music, dancing, poetry, fiction, story telling, painting, sculpture and architecture to express a Reality that goes beyond word concepts. Still, mysticism calls for intelligent application of discipline, self criticism, and introspection. The God of the mystics may be more satisfying to women because it introduces the female element into the divine. Taoism with its Yin/Yang and Buddhism, and Hinduism has been more successful than the West in embedding mysticism in a rigorous manner. The God of the mystics is not easy for the mind to ingest. Mystics have to work to attain this elevated sense of reality known as God - without a name.

We are learning it is possible to acquire some of the mystical attitudes even though most of us are not yet capable of the states of higher consciousness achieved by a mystic. Humans can learn that the word God is a symbol of an ineffable reality that is transcendent. Biofeedback machines are a help because they take ordinary humans to a theta state. Combining the power of a home computer with CD programs and biofeedback devices is already enabling many to experience enhanced elevated states. Today most people seem to have lost the will to make this imaginative effort. But, there are the fortunate few among the spiritual but not religious who can feel the emanations of the universal God when they chant:

I am a part of the Light, the Light is within me,the Light and I are One with God., or,

I am a part of the Water, the Water is within me, and the Water and I are One with God, and,

I am a part of the Universe, the Universe is within Me, and the Universe and I are One with God.

In the ancient and recent past people always created new symbols to act as the focus for spirituality. Humans have always created a faith to carry them through life's dynamics,from happiness to grief, to renewal, even in times of adversity and great uncertainty. For many, nihilism, aimlessness, and alienation a state of mind further dulled by stress and violence seem to characterize modern life. They are among those who are not acting to create a faith in God or Tao , it matters little what the word is , Just do it! Humans can avoid despair as a state of mind. The presence in America and elsewhere of the escapism of Big Brother fundamentalism, media generated End Time,and the magic of instant gratification intoned by the charismatic media preachers is not reassuring. Working toward a healthy, compassionate human society is not easy.

In Europe there is a growing empty space where God once existed within the human consciousness. Humans who see the empty space have failed to listen to the warning of those who foretold the death of the spirit if one was no longer able to create a faith in life's meaning. Humans can not endure for long the emptiness and desolation of such a vacuum. The media generated idols of fundamentalism are not working substitutes for God. The history of God and Man tells us that to capitulate to nihilism opens the door to the false leaders of fascism and the death of freedom and liberty.


Encouragement for the Questing Journey During the 21st Century

This is a Message from the MeetingHouse where one finds those who flow with the One Spirit's Stream of Consciousness. Follow the Light. A strong belief in almost any force for good is now recognized as having health benefits. According to health givers, including allopathic physicians (western medicine), whether it is faith in God, or some benevolent power, this strong belief has efficacious healing power. There is an emerging paradigm of subtle energy medicine that supplies support for ancient health-giving practices such as herbal medicine, massage, acupuncture, hypnosis, nutrition, meditation and so on. Today, we recognize that the human cell wall is much more than a physical barrier with receptors designed to protect the cell's contents. We are beginning to see that the cell wall is an interactive window.

The cell membrane is so permeable that millions of ions flow into and out of the cell in nanoseconds. We have become aware that we are dependent on mitochondria - microscopic organelles- that reside within human cells, which are necessary for energy production and respiration. Do the energies produced course through the body and mind in a way related to the ancient concepts of chi,meridians, and prana, chakras, Until recently, Western Medicine researchers concentrated on how mood, cravings, responses to stress, behavior are mediated by hormones functioning as neurotransmitters. Examples are serotonin, dopamine, and endorphins, among others. Medicines for depression have been developed based on such research. Clearly, the mind and body converse by way of hormones, neurotransmitters, and chemical and electromagnetic forces.

We are discovering the mind/body energies that are the powerful resonating signal amplifiers, which allow the cells to make appropriate responses. The body contains its own best pharmacy. If there is a physical way to experience God, then mere belief will become not necessary. We don't have to believe in gravity in order to experience gravity. Humans are gaining more understanding of the healing ways of nature. The Way could be a religio-scientific approach that blends our understanding of the unity of nature with the different levels of reality  material; quantum, and virtual. Thereby we will understand how the human brain/ body, particularly the nervous system, works in response to its environs. Getting close to God through a true knowing would heal the fear of death, for it would confirm the existence of the soul, and give an ultimate meaning to life. Consider what we know today as we continue the questing journey (The word God is a symbol for the Good Force).
As Humans we all Have SEVEN Different Biological Responses:

  1. When we experience the primitive survival response fight/flight we know we need protection so we seek it from God. This primitive survival response is part of our evolved human nature.
  2. If we feel the need to react to a threat or opportunity we pray for the Almighty (The Force for Good) to help us to control that event in our life and to reward us or punish us for our wrongdoing. We see God in the reactive response of Job and Moses.
  3. Feeling peace inside, we experience the God Force as providing peace of mind. The sainted leaders of various religions are worthy of study. Seeing our world through the eyes of those such as Lao Tzu, Isaiah, Buddha, Christ, Mohammed, Hildegard, Gandhi, and others, who walked with God enable us to better understand the value of meditation and contemplation. Thus we find we can access consciousness.
  4. When our intuition is responding better and we are beginning to understand ourselves better, then we thank God and continue to hope.
  5. We are responding to God, the Creator of the Universe, when our own creative powers are synchronizing with the World as we feel it ought to be. The Book of Genesis is about the creative response.
  6. When we have a Visionary response we are in communication with the Infinite Mind. We are channeling the God-Force as did the alchemist, miracle worker, and magician. This does not mean one is clairvoyant or more spiritual than others. Though for some that may be true. For most, it just means one has opened a channel because one has a brain that developed that way, or, one has that ability gained through practice or learning. The many miracles we see or hear about are the visionary response.
  7. If you are in the sacred response then one is experiencing God, as the immeasurable potential of all that was, is, and will be. When Moses asked God for his name, God said, I am that I am. Our role is to love and to experience unity-consciousness , to know at the deepest level of our being that we humans are One Spirit in different guises.
These seven responses are the all in all of the world religions. These responses correspond to levels of awareness and spiritual experience. The Global Experience of the twenty first century ought to be for all to unite in carefully conserving the Earth with its myriad cultural heritages that embellish this planet. By loving Earth and God and serving others we transit to knowing the Global Experience with the Spirit of God. Respectfully Submitted to One and All, By Dr. James R Cooper, Pastor
MeetingHouse for Aspiring Spirits
2822 Peavine Trail
Lakeland, Florida, 33810-2332
863-859-7909
Click here to e-mail.


Other Web Sites:
Recommended Readings:
  • Armstrong, Karen, a History of God, Knopf Publishing, New York, 1994. Alan Jacobs, Editor, The Wisdom of (Ramesh) Balsekar, Watkins Publishing, London, UK, 2004.
  • Slater, Lauren, Love, National Geographic, February 2008
  • Bowker, John, GOD, A Brief History , The Human Search for Eternal Truth, DK Publishing, Studio Cactus, 2002

Steven Weinberg,"Without God,"The New York Review September 25,2008 p. 73 - 76. Weinberg asserts that the world view of science is (paraphrase)"There is no point to life; no objective moral principles; no correspondence between moral law and the laws of nature. We humans act on chance mutations over millions of years. A chilling prospect. But, he adds: we must not sink into nihilism. We live on a knife-edge between wishful thinking and despair." He leaves this end-game dilemma without offering a practical alternative for the living.
The MeetingHouse adds this comment: If bad human actions push one off the edge into the pit of despair what should we do? Is there nothing that we can appeal to that will give us hope that we can climb out of despair back on to the knife edge again? Where in the world is the compassion to lift our hopes that nihilism and despair are not the dismal prospect for us all? Can most of us go through life to its end without a belief that if we try to do right it will be worth doing? Camus was wrong!- Suicide is not a viable alternative to Life!.It is death. Choosing some sort of belief that there is a high value in doing of good virtuous works by serving others.This way seems to be a practical alternative to the chilling prospect. Is the choice of belief based on proven evidence? No. Does it really matter that it is not scientific fact? If it works, isn't it better than the prospect of living every day with nihilistic despair, on the one hand, or, a belief in magic, on the other?

Copyright Notice©2008 James R. Cooper Cooper